-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
Copy pathkansalerpoi_zho-simplified.srt
1968 lines (1476 loc) · 39.7 KB
/
kansalerpoi_zho-simplified.srt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1
00:00:03,500 --> 00:00:07,000
bripre(谓语关系的人)第四集
2
00:00:07,100 --> 00:00:10,900
独裁者
3
00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:24,400
本故事纯属纪实,如有雷同纯属当然
4
00:00:25,900 --> 00:00:30,800
事情的开始之章
5
00:00:30,900 --> 00:00:38,300
我们#lojban IRC的人是逻辑语的专家.
6
00:00:38,400 --> 00:00:43,500
同意,但官方语法没有用.
7
00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:46,900
官方语法不重要.
8
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:52,700
我们#lojban IRC的就是管理逻辑语社区的.
9
00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:58,000
对,专家的我们可以随意修改语法.
10
00:00:58,100 --> 00:01:05,400
对,让我们修改我们有,我们治,我们享之逻辑语吧!
11
00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:09,100
(拍手喝采)
12
00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:13,000
我使名字词(cmevla)是tanru单位(作为谓词(selbri)的单词序列)!
13
00:01:13,100 --> 00:01:18,100
我使连接词依照Selpa'i的系统来!
14
00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:23,000
我添加了新的虚词(cmavo)和新的词类(selma'o)!
15
00:01:23,100 --> 00:01:28,000
很好,但不要添加由柯蒂斯·弗兰克斯创造的单词啊!
16
00:01:28,100 --> 00:01:31,000
真的,没有人用它们.
17
00:01:31,100 --> 00:01:33,500
明白了!
18
00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,600
词类的ZOhOI完成了!
19
00:01:36,700 --> 00:01:40,100
词类MEhOI也完成了!
20
00:01:42,500 --> 00:01:49,600
讨厌新的语法! 我们的官方语法对我很好.
21
00:01:49,700 --> 00:01:53,400
同意,无需修改.
22
00:01:53,500 --> 00:02:02,000
我好容易学习了官方语法.我不想学新的语法.
23
00:02:03,800 --> 00:02:10,600
#lojban IRC的语法就是现代逻辑语方言的语法.
24
00:02:10,700 --> 00:02:14,000
我应该来教这个.
25
00:02:25,500 --> 00:02:27,200
完成了.
26
00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:31,100
喔,讨厌!
27
00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:37,300
引用Gleki和#lojban IRC
28
00:02:38,300 --> 00:02:42,400
“Gleki的速成课程(Crash Course)”.
29
00:02:42,500 --> 00:02:47,000
用这个来教初学者.
30
00:02:47,100 --> 00:02:57,000
与CLL(官方书)的旧式逻辑语冲突的方面: 这里有现代逻辑语与CLL中描述的语言的差异.这些就是与CLL冲突的部份.
31
00:02:57,100 --> 00:03:01,100
这个语法分析器用于La Bangu.
32
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:07,200
喔,讨厌,Gleki入侵了官方网站!
33
00:03:08,300 --> 00:03:14,300
喔,Gleki完全跳过了语言规划委员会(bpfk)的程序.
34
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:25,000
此外,那个分析器缺乏关于制作者的信息,并放在官方网站上.
35
00:03:25,100 --> 00:03:33,600
这会让逻辑语使用者以为那个分析器是由官方机构批准的.
36
00:03:35,800 --> 00:03:38,100
我好伤心.
37
00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:40,500
喔,什么事呀?
38
00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:43,000
看看词类ZOhOI吧!
39
00:03:43,100 --> 00:03:48,100
你看,那个意味着玻里尼西亚人必须离开逻辑语的国家.
40
00:03:48,200 --> 00:03:52,400
说真的,我姥姥是玻里尼西亚人.
41
00:03:54,100 --> 00:03:56,000
我来解释吧.
42
00:03:56,100 --> 00:04:01,400
词类ZOhOI和MEhOI是非逻辑语单词的标签.
43
00:04:01,500 --> 00:04:11,200
听说一个暂停或声门塞音(.)分离非逻辑语单词和附近的单词.
44
00:04:11,300 --> 00:04:20,000
然而,玻里尼西亚语言有包含声门塞音(.)的单词
45
00:04:20,100 --> 00:04:27,500
因此有一些玻里尼西亚单词,词类ZOhOI和MEhOI不能成为这些的标签.
46
00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:34,500
例如,“zo'oi `uli`uli”(“`”是夏威夷语的声门塞音的标志,在逻辑语它用ASCII符号的句子“.”写出来.)
47
00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:51,800
因此,词类ZOhOI和MEhOI与《逻辑语大全》(官方书)第1.1节中描述的中立概念相冲突.
48
00:04:55,500 --> 00:04:58,900
太遗憾了.不要痛苦!
49
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:03,000
我相信#lojban IRC的人不打算伤害你.
50
00:05:03,100 --> 00:05:09,200
没办法,#lojban IRC人似乎缺乏中立的概念,
51
00:05:09,300 --> 00:05:19,500
但除了词类ZOhOI和MEhOI之外,这对于使用逻辑语的人还不坏.
52
00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:22,500
嗯,不知道.
53
00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:31,600
对了,#lojban IRC的语法不从Xorxes的Zasni Gerna(暂定语法)继承所有美丽的东西.
54
00:05:31,700 --> 00:05:33,800
为什么?
55
00:05:33,900 --> 00:05:38,500
可能对于#lojban IRC的人来说美丽或许并不重要.
56
00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:42,900
看来它继承了只有对#lojban IRC的人有用的东西.
57
00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:48,400
我认为官方语法在结构性质上不是令我满意.
58
00:05:48,500 --> 00:05:55,500
但我不想遵从#lojban IRC的语法.对我来说,这是丑陋的.
59
00:05:55,600 --> 00:06:02,400
我想遵从我认为美丽的另一个语法.
60
00:06:02,500 --> 00:06:10,900
嗯,我开始打算创造我遵从的一个语法.
61
00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:16,600
我要创造我使用的语法解析器.
62
00:06:16,700 --> 00:06:19,400
很好,是多样性啊!
63
00:06:19,500 --> 00:06:28,900
当虚词"jo'au"(方言指示符)在语法中时,没有理由逻辑语只有一个语法.
64
00:06:36,800 --> 00:07:03,700
对,用虚词“jo'au”,听者会知道这文本遵照哪个版本的逻辑语.
65
00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:30,700
对,用虚词“jo'au”,听者会知道这文本遵照哪个版本的逻辑语.
66
00:07:42,300 --> 00:08:17,000
我打算创造,创造我的语法,我遵从的.我打算创造,创造我的语法,我觉得美丽的.
67
00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:21,300
高兴啊,我努力地创造我的语法.
68
00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:28,600
嗯,我要给我的语法解析器命名为"Zantufa(令人满意的解析器)".
69
00:08:29,500 --> 00:08:36,500
章节：我要使结构性质划分数字和非数字元.
70
00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:48,000
"bi ny bajra(有八个跑的.)"
71
00:08:48,100 --> 00:08:50,400
完成了!
72
00:08:52,700 --> 00:08:54,500
我解释吧.
73
00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:59,700
例如"8"是数字,"n"是非数字元.
74
00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:06,900
根据官方语法,"8n"表示一个数.
75
00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:13,800
例如,"bi ny bajra(有8*10+n个跑步者,...)"
76
00:09:13,900 --> 00:09:21,900
并且为了"8"和"n"彼此分离,也需要说"boi",例如
77
00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:30,000
"bi boi ny bajra(有八个跑的.)"
78
00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:42,300
章节：使虚词"pi'e"属于词类VUhU
79
00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:53,000
"li pa bi pi'e re vo(18:24)"
80
00:09:53,100 --> 00:09:55,300
完成了!
81
00:09:56,900 --> 00:09:59,200
我解释吧.
82
00:09:59,300 --> 00:10:06,300
根据官方语法,"pa bi pi'e re vo(18:24)"
83
00:10:06,400 --> 00:10:09,000
表示一个数.
84
00:10:09,100 --> 00:10:18,400
而数字串由"pi'e"剪切的事情仅取决於"pi'e"的含义.
85
00:10:24,300 --> 00:10:30,500
她还把"pi'e"移到了VUhU.
86
00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:34,000
有点糟糕.
87
00:10:34,100 --> 00:10:36,900
也许这样.
88
00:10:40,800 --> 00:10:46,300
章节：我要修改一下词类SI的结构,
89
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:51,600
并且使虚词"ze'ei"和"zei"属于词类SI.
90
00:10:56,200 --> 00:11:04,300
"li zo'e ze'ei pa(一个数)"
91
00:11:04,400 --> 00:11:11,100
"mi zei tcita("我"-标签)"
92
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:14,000
完成了!
93
00:11:15,700 --> 00:11:17,200
我来解释吧.
94
00:11:17,300 --> 00:11:24,900
根据官方语法,虚词"si"删除前面单词.
95
00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:31,500
例如,"oi si coi(哎呀...不,你好!)",
96
00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:37,000
虚词“zei”使两个词成为tanru单位,
97
00:11:37,100 --> 00:11:45,900
例如,"vanci zei coi(是晚上问候.)"
98
00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:50,900
根据Zantufa,虚词“si”不变,
99
00:11:51,000 --> 00:12:01,100
可是虚词“zei”或“ze'ei”连接前面单词的含义和后面单词的句法结构,
100
00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:08,900
例如,"vanci zei coi(晚上好!)"
101
00:12:18,300 --> 00:12:26,500
哈哈,Zantufa使虚词"zei"和"ze'ei"属于词类SI.
102
00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:29,700
对,太棒了.
103
00:12:35,300 --> 00:12:42,200
章节：看来词类SA恰似一张网,穿透各种结构.
104
00:12:42,300 --> 00:12:45,800
这是很不好的.
105
00:12:45,900 --> 00:12:53,500
同意,但没有办法为词类SA结构简单.
106
00:12:53,600 --> 00:13:01,700
不过这么丑的结构也不能让用户满意.
107
00:13:01,800 --> 00:13:08,300
如此说来以前Xorxes也说过同样的,或类似的话.
108
00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:13,600
我认为当词类LOhAI在语法中的时候,
109
00:13:18,500 --> 00:13:21,000
词类SA没有什么用.
110
00:13:21,100 --> 00:13:32,100
"do pa sanji tu lo'ai pa sa'ai ba le'ai"
111
00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,500
它这样解析,
112
00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:43,000
然后语义解析器要解析这样:"do ba sanji tu(你会注意到那个.)"
113
00:13:43,100 --> 00:13:50,500
同意,词类SA不会感知虚词"ba"替换虚词"pa".
114
00:13:50,600 --> 00:14:02,100
例如,"do pa sanji tu sa ba sanji tu(你,一个注意到的,那 -对不起,会注意到那个.)"
115
00:14:02,200 --> 00:14:04,700
哈哈!
116
00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:09,300
我从我的语法里删除词类 SA.
117
00:14:23,100 --> 00:14:29,900
我相信词类SA是丑陋的存在.
118
00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:36,400
我相信词类SA打扰我的语法.
119
00:14:36,500 --> 00:14:43,200
再见，SA!
120
00:14:43,300 --> 00:14:47,500
如我所愿，我没有词类SA.
121
00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:49,800
高兴(.ui)!
122
00:14:50,300 --> 00:14:55,000
完成了,它变得更简单更美丽了.
123
00:14:55,900 --> 00:15:00,900
章节：我要修改连接词的结构.
124
00:15:05,500 --> 00:15:13,300
"joi gi ti gi ta gi tu(这个,那个和远远的)"
125
00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:18,200
我解释吧.
126
00:15:18,300 --> 00:15:25,200
根据官方语法,前置连接词仅涉及连系两个对象,
127
00:15:25,300 --> 00:15:32,200
例如,"joi gi ti gi ta(这个和那个)".
128
00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:50,400
"又步行,游泳或飞翔,又唱歌又跳舞."
129
00:15:52,500 --> 00:15:54,400
我解释吧.
130
00:15:54,500 --> 00:16:02,600
根据官方语法,虚词"gi'i"属于词类GIhA,而表示疑问,
131
00:16:02,700 --> 00:16:12,400
例如,"do cadzu gi'i se relxilma'e(你走路还是骑脚踏车?)"
132
00:16:12,500 --> 00:16:19,100
根据Zantufa,一串虚词"ji cu"替换虚词"gi'i",
133
00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:29,500
例如,"do cadzu ji cu se relxilma'e(你走路还是骑自行车?)"
134
00:16:29,600 --> 00:16:39,200
而虚词“gi'i”属于词类GIhI并且是前置连接词的终端词.
135
00:16:43,100 --> 00:16:52,500
"gi pu bo ba jersi ta gi surla(在未来追逐之前,我休息一下.)"
136
00:16:54,700 --> 00:16:57,200
我解释吧.
137
00:16:57,300 --> 00:17:06,200
根据官方语法,前置连接词的虚词“pu”仅在虚词“gi”之前,
138
00:17:06,300 --> 00:17:14,600
例如,"pu gi ba jersi ta gi surla(在未来的追逐之前,我先休息一下.)"
139
00:17:14,700 --> 00:17:20,800
根据Zantufa,把虚词“pu”可以放在虚词gi之前或之后.
140
00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:25,400
完成了!
141
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:36,900
我的前置连接词对各种句法结构都有用.
142
00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:45,200
我的前置连接词有处理任何数量的项目的能力.
143
00:17:45,300 --> 00:17:53,800
没有前置连接词只能涉及两个项目的理由.
144
00:17:53,900 --> 00:17:57,800
这里那里和远处,远处,那里和这里我去.
145
00:17:57,900 --> 00:18:02,500
这个那个和远处,远处那个和这个我选择.
146
00:18:10,300 --> 00:18:18,600
没有前置连接词必须总是涉及两个项目的理由.
147
00:18:18,700 --> 00:18:22,600
这个那个和远远的,远远的那个和这个我遇到了.
148
00:18:22,700 --> 00:18:28,300
这个那个和远远的,远远的那个和这个打招呼了.
149
00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:36,700
哎呀
150
00:18:36,800 --> 00:18:38,900
胡乱改动了.
151
00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:43,500
她改用了"gi'i",嘿.
152
00:18:43,600 --> 00:18:50,500
嗯,她创造了n项的“gi”的事吗?
153
00:18:50,600 --> 00:18:52,100
对
154
00:18:52,200 --> 00:18:57,100
我认为这真的有岐意的问题.
155
00:18:57,200 --> 00:19:03,600
我认为她改用了“gi'i”来修复它.因此GIhI.
156
00:19:03,700 --> 00:19:12,100
"ta broda je cu brode(那个做1和做2.)"
157
00:19:12,200 --> 00:19:18,700
哼,Selpa'i-"jecu"行啊,
158
00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:24,000
可是 Selpa'i-"gu je"不行.
159
00:19:24,100 --> 00:19:32,000
哦,zantufa是"ga je"也没有的.很奇怪.
160
00:19:32,100 --> 00:19:37,000
"gi je"替换了,还是奇怪.
161
00:19:37,100 --> 00:19:43,700
以下字元串似的非Zantufa也必须包括在内.
162
00:19:43,800 --> 00:19:50,700
"gi ba bo broda gi brode(先做1,然后再做2)"
163
00:19:50,800 --> 00:19:57,000
显然,它具有与"ba gi"相同的意思,
164
00:19:57,100 --> 00:20:01,200
但如果允许这样:
165
00:20:01,300 --> 00:20:11,000
"ba gi ba bo broda gi brode(在未来,先做1,然后再做2)"
166
00:20:11,100 --> 00:20:20,100
"ba gi ba bo broda gi brode gi'i je mo(在未来,先做1,然后再做2,又做什么?)"
167
00:20:20,200 --> 00:20:25,300
应该剥夺Zantufa的许多事情.
168
00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:30,800
呃,哦,它产生了"gu'ek(tanru(作为谓词的单词序列)的连接词)".
169
00:20:30,900 --> 00:20:40,000
"ge broda gi brode zo'e gi'i(又做1,又做2某种)"
170
00:20:40,100 --> 00:20:43,000
坏了吗?
171
00:20:45,800 --> 00:20:47,800
啊,我犯了一个错误.
172
00:20:52,800 --> 00:21:01,000
"ge broda gi brode zo'e gi'i(又做1,又做2某种)"
173
00:21:01,100 --> 00:21:03,000
修理了!
174
00:21:03,100 --> 00:21:08,300
感谢#lojban IRC用户发现了错误.
175
00:21:08,800 --> 00:21:14,900
章节：使语法与逻辑一致.
176
00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:25,300
根据蒯因的哲学,词类NU的结构中的公式是不透明的.
177
00:21:25,400 --> 00:21:34,000
因此,我认为在NU结构中公式表示的命题和...
178
00:21:34,100 --> 00:21:40,300
在NU结构外公式表示的命题...
179
00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:48,000
并不总是有一个共同的论域.
180
00:21:48,100 --> 00:21:59,200
从这个动机我给NU结构的论域赋予了完全的逻辑能力.
181
00:21:59,300 --> 00:22:09,500
换句话说,NU结构包含一个说完的合式公式,也就是在逻辑语法语法中称为"statement"的.
182
00:22:12,100 --> 00:22:18,000
"nu mo .i bo mo(是做什么,还做什么的事情?)"
183
00:22:18,100 --> 00:22:22,500
哇!!我认为这是不正确的.
184
00:22:22,600 --> 00:22:25,800
不过是意图.
185
00:22:25,900 --> 00:22:30,500
虚词"i"是文本的主要概念.
186
00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:36,000
虚词"i"使读者移动到第0层,
187
00:22:36,100 --> 00:22:41,700
不过根据Zantufa,它不使移动.
188
00:22:41,800 --> 00:22:46,600
关于不相容性"gek(前置连接词)"差不多.
189
00:22:46,700 --> 00:22:55,300
总之就是Zantufa实现了"JE CU",改用了"gi'i",
190
00:22:55,400 --> 00:23:03,400
但没有实现"GA JE"和"GU JE".
191
00:23:03,500 --> 00:23:09,400
等一下,也许zantufa采取了不同的方法...
192
00:23:09,500 --> 00:23:16,600
"je gi broda gi brode(又做1,又做2)"
193
00:23:16,700 --> 00:23:24,000
"gi je broda gi brode(又做1,又做2)"
194
00:23:24,100 --> 00:23:28,000
批准了两个形式.
195
00:23:28,100 --> 00:23:35,300
哦.不过它如何区分前置连接的tanru(作为谓词的单词序列)和bridi(谓词关系;说话者把谓词关系和公式混淆)?
196
00:23:35,400 --> 00:23:43,500
"gi je cu broda gi cu brode(又做1,又做2)"
197
00:23:43,600 --> 00:23:53,000
我不知道.我试图过使解析器把非tanru的前置形又解析又失败.
198
00:23:53,100 --> 00:23:57,500
不,我应该说"又试图过那件事,又失败了."
199
00:23:57,600 --> 00:24:10,300
哦."gi je broda gi brode zo'e gi'i je cu mo(又做1又做2某种,又做什么?)"
200
00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:16,500
哎呀,Zantufa使用秘密的连接系统.
201
00:24:16,600 --> 00:24:19,900
我想大概有解释.
202
00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:24,800
须要暴力学习,哈哈!
203
00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:33,000
哎呀,我又犯了错误.
204
00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:46,800
"gi je broda gi brode zo'e gi'i je cu mo(又做1,又做2某种,又做什么?)"
205
00:24:46,900 --> 00:24:49,900
修理了!
206
00:24:55,400 --> 00:25:01,000
"lo nu broda i bo brode(做1,还做2的事情)"
207
00:25:01,100 --> 00:25:03,300
魔法啊!
208
00:25:03,400 --> 00:25:06,900
我不喜欢.
209
00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:13,900
可是它跟Gleki的"i bo"冲突.
210
00:25:18,500 --> 00:25:22,700
Gleki的"i bo"是什么?
211
00:25:22,800 --> 00:25:31,900
Gleki说,这是一种方式,在完成一个句子之后添加词类UI的结构.
212
00:25:32,000 --> 00:25:38,400
我看过在速成课程他教这件事,
213
00:25:38,500 --> 00:25:47,100
例如,"do pu sidju mi i bo ui(你帮过我,高兴啊.)"
214
00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:49,000
啊,知道了.
215
00:25:49,100 --> 00:25:59,300
看来那个结构是句子和空缺由"i bo"连接的.
216
00:25:59,400 --> 00:26:10,400
一般来说,"ui"的意思涉及虚词"bo"或空缺,不会涉及前面的句子.
217
00:26:10,500 --> 00:26:21,600
同意.Gleki教授的内容与逻辑语的自由修饰词的标準范围系统不一致.
218
00:26:21,700 --> 00:26:31,500
Gleki也许希望这是在自由修饰词中特殊的属性.
219
00:26:31,600 --> 00:26:40,400
为什么Gleki不使用虚词"vau"来添加UI的结构?
220
00:26:40,500 --> 00:26:47,100
也许原因是"vau"结束仅原子公式,但不会结束说完的合式公式,
221
00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:54,600
例如,"mi jinvi lo du'u ta mulno vau ui(我认为高兴地完成那件.)"
222
00:26:54,700 --> 00:27:04,400
这个跟"mi jinvi lo du'u ta mulno vau vau ui(我认为完成了那件,高兴啊.)"
223
00:27:04,500 --> 00:27:16,800
我懂了.我想稍后尝试另一种方式,使后续"ui"涉及一个说完的合式公式.
224
00:27:18,500 --> 00:27:20,500
哎呀,太糟了!
225
00:27:20,600 --> 00:27:25,600
现在她走得太远了.
226
00:27:25,700 --> 00:27:29,900
我应该创造Maltufa(太糟的解析器):p
227
00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:33,300
一切都属于UI.
228
00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:36,000
lo'u zei gentufa(无结构解析器).
229
00:27:36,100 --> 00:27:37,900
哈哈.
230
00:27:38,000 --> 00:27:45,000
"lo nu broda .i je brode(又做1又做2的事情.)"
231
00:27:45,100 --> 00:27:54,500
如果“i”不开始新句子...哎呀呀呀呀.
232
00:27:54,600 --> 00:27:59,700
嗯,对,我认识一个问题.
233
00:27:59,800 --> 00:28:04,800
它基本上消除了可以省略的终端词.
234
00:28:04,900 --> 00:28:09,000
我真的不会使用"i bo",
235
00:28:09,100 --> 00:28:16,800
可是"i je"可能有问题.
236
00:28:16,900 --> 00:28:23,400
"lo nu broda .i brode(做1的事情.做2.)"
237
00:28:23,500 --> 00:28:28,000
这样,它也打破了组合性.
238
00:28:28,100 --> 00:28:31,600
NU/NOI是非常常见的.
239
00:28:31,700 --> 00:28:44,600
我也害怕,要是更改对NU结构后续的"i"的意思的话,会破坏大量的文本.
240
00:28:44,700 --> 00:28:48,200
更改对NU结构后续的"i"的意思会带来灾难,因此你需要明确地使用"tu'e".
241
00:28:48,300 --> 00:29:02,800
例如,"i mi djica lo nu tu'e do klama lo mi zdani i ba bo mi'o samkei kansi'u tu'u(我想让你来我家,然后我们一起玩游戏.)"
242
00:29:04,900 --> 00:29:11,700
太遗憾了! TUhE结构不是在逻辑语语法中被称为"sentence"的原子公式.
243
00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:20,000
官方语法和#lojban IRC语法的NU结构不会包含这个.
244
00:29:20,100 --> 00:29:24,800
至於Zantufa,没有问题.
245
00:29:24,900 --> 00:29:37,100
"i mi djica lo nu tu'e do klama lo mi zdani i ba bo mi'o samkei kansi'u tu'u(我想让你来我家,然后我们一起玩游戏.)"
246
00:29:41,200 --> 00:29:46,300
这样,"tu'e"本质上表现得像LU,
247
00:29:46,400 --> 00:29:51,400
可是其结果不是sumti(谓词的项),但是bridi(谓词关系;说话者把谓词关系和公式混淆).
248
00:29:54,500 --> 00:30:01,200
这是不对的.确切地说,它不是原子公式,而是一个说完的合式公式.
249
00:30:03,200 --> 00:30:09,000
不过Zantufa目前比那更远.
250
00:30:09,100 --> 00:30:13,200
啊,我错过了.抱歉.