-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 907
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why author needed modify user data sites ??? What is it - the desire to gain access to confidential information? It also expands the opportunities for abuse !!! Explain !!! #513
Comments
The developer got hacked, and is working with Google to regain control. See #512. I'd recommend not updating the Chrome extension for now. |
Should I be worried? The extension just updated for me, and all my tabs got closed. I saw it got disabled and even ignored the security warning message and re-enabled the extension and reopened and loaded my tabs. :x |
Yes, disable the extension. Use a session manager like Session Buddy to save your tab list before doing so if you are concerned about losing the list. |
@Infinitay I think this happened because Google disabled the extension. |
@Corrodias Any idea what the hacked extension does? |
Read the linked issue for the current discussion. The only obvious change is the version number, but of course it can't be trusted. |
Same here. Just found out that many of my tabs suddenly got closed, then noticed that suspend shortcut isn't working. |
Does that means that any of our saved data (usernames, passwords etc) may have been hacked ? |
Well, expansion of 6.22 was broken and criminals and therefore require an extension - "to read and modify all your data on the websites you visit." |
Sure, I can answer that by quoting the readme file:If you were asked recently to accept new permissions, this is purely because you were upgrading from an older version of the extension to a newer one (v6.22). The extension has required these permissions to operate for quite some time now and is not related at all to the extension being compromised. |
And as a long time user of 6.21, I can guarantee that that old version did require the same permissions. |
And please see this thread for an explanation of why the extension requests these permissions: #213 |
Thank you for the clarification, deanoemcke! |
Dear deanoemcke, sorry that once again I write here, but I just came up an interesting idea and I would like you as a developer to ask - is it possible to do some special option (user selectable) when choosing which extension will not ask such terrible permissions (READ and CHANGE ALL data)? Let maybe some extra features will not be available in this case (for example screen shot, etc.). I think then to all these questions, fears and suspicions of many users would simply fall away by themselves! |
I have considered this, and as a result I created another extension called The Great Discarder. It is significantly better than The Great Suspender in terms of memory use and required permissions, but lacks the features that these permissions enable. |
as the author explains finally: what he needs to "change all user data on all websites" ??? This is simply not acceptable !!! Because it gives the author access to passwords and personal data !!! Why so abuse the trust of users ??? And most importantly - this writer does not speak a word !!! WHY?!?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: