stadium and pitch once on top of landuse on once below

[Klumbumbus]

See example:

North and south terrace are under construction atm. The landuse=construction in the north is rendered on top of the stadium and the pitch and the landuse=construction in the south is rendered below the stadium and the pitch (which is better imo.)

Location: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.84212/12.94605

[pnorman]

Painters dictates this results here. I don't think there's anything to fix.

[matthijsmelissen]

We order landuse by size, which is probably the best ordering. The result is unfortunate in this case, but I don't think we can comeup with a better ordering.

[Klumbumbus]

ok.

[mboeringa]

math1985 and pnorman: although I understand the solution chosen from a technical point of view, I think the better cartographic solution to this problem might be, besides a forced ordering, to no longer render greenfields and brownfields as a solid polygon fill, but instead use an open hatch pattern, like with military zones. This will be far more acceptable in case of overlaps. As I saw someone writing on the forums, greenfields and brownfields are more like legal statuses for certain areas, or development plans. As such, they can, and will, cover other landuses and potentially many other features like buildings (in case of a derelict brownfield). Therefore rendering them as an open hatch on top of all other polygon layers, as I do in my OSM Renderer for ArcGIS and similar to military zones, is far more logical.

[matkoniecz]

greenfields are not rendered after #663

[mboeringa]

Well, that is the other more drastic solution ;)

Ah well, and I falsely assumed this was some green- or brownfield, of course, the OP correctly and clearly wrote this as being landuse=construction, but I mistook the dark brown color... although this thus raise the question, if I shouldn't be rendering landuse=construction as hatch too?...