You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
-1. I think it is clearly an indication that either the object misses or we
don't render some other important tag (in this case historic=city_gate)
when a feature which has a wikipedia tag is not rendered. Rendering
wikipedia-objects (what special maps like the open link map already do) is
fine for special maps, but for our general map it would do more harm than
good: it will not encourage mappers to describe an object well with
suitable tags but rather content a lot of them because the feature gets
already rendered even though still missing basic formal classification.
In this particular case there are also a lot of city gates and former city
gates which don't have an article in wikipedia but still should be rendered
on the main map.
I agree with @dieterdreist: if we currently don't render an object with a Wikipedia-tag, it either means a tag is missing in the data, or we are not rendering an important tag.
I think it is safe to assume that object with wikipedia article is important enough to be rendered.
example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410779713
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: