-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 824
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please render natural=fell #2923
Comments
Why do you think it's useful to make it a separate issue? |
I'd love this to happen, but for the life of me, I can't think of a rendering style that works. Does anyone have any suggestions? |
@turnsole80 I can't think of a distinct rendering style that would make sense, for the reasons spelt out at #545 (comment) . In a different map style I do render it via https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/0276ca282634b7d6af368e8614b0bf5dfc000530/style.lua#L1536 , but that's essentially based on the fact that people misuse "heath" for "generic upland". Edit: For completeness, an example location in my rendering is https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=54.72325&lon=-2.17217 which is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93490534 . |
Closing as duplicate of #545 Note #545 (comment) |
natural=fell was already discussed in #545. Opening new issue that was not even linking discussion that happened makes no sense. Overall, I think that #545 from start should be split into separate issues, but as discussion already started there long time ago it is not useful to split this issue now. |
This issue is part of #545
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: