You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I think the rendering of the intersections between lines tagged as natural=tree_row and barrier=hedge should be the same as the rendering of 2 tree_rows intersecting each other.
See the example below where everything is summed up:
Here, the hedges end exactly on a node belonging to the tree_row.
The intersection is treated as two transparent layers adding to each other.
But IMHO, the intersection should simply be the same color, not "the two layers added". Do you see what I mean ?
Or is it a bad mapping idea to finish hedges on tree_rows ?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This can be fixed by changing tree rows to use a solid green color, without transparency (opacity). This will make them look more similar to linear natural=wood or landuse=forest features, and that may be a benefit as well.
Hi,
I think the rendering of the intersections between lines tagged as natural=tree_row and barrier=hedge should be the same as the rendering of 2 tree_rows intersecting each other.
See the example below where everything is summed up:
Here, the hedges end exactly on a node belonging to the tree_row.
The intersection is treated as two transparent layers adding to each other.
But IMHO, the intersection should simply be the same color, not "the two layers added". Do you see what I mean ?
Or is it a bad mapping idea to finish hedges on tree_rows ?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: