Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2021-01-07] Open an issue to discuss expansions we might take atop Schema Coordinates #592

Closed
benjie opened this issue Jan 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Action item 🎬 Ready for review 🙌 Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group meetings.

Comments

@benjie
Copy link
Member

benjie commented Jan 18, 2021

The Schema Coordinates RFC has a very narrow goal, deliberately. This is great; but we can build upon this syntax to standardize a lot more of how we reference things in GraphQL which will enable even more powerful tooling. Benjie recently discussed this with @daniman from Apollo and shared this with the WG; it was suggested that having this discussion in a closed issue/merged PR could lose important attention so Benjie is to open an issue with a summary of the current discussions around this topic and to gather feedback from others.

Benjie: explains discussion with Danielle and summarises: graphql/graphql-spec/pull/746#issuecomment-740914167
Benjie: if there are other use cases for this, now would be the time to say
Mike: where should we discuss that
Mark: in the RFC
Lee: it's fine for that to happen there; it's hard to follow discussions on closed PRs. Maybe we should open an new issue about how Schema Coordinates can be evolved.
Mike: I'd like to surface how we might use this; we track usage of deprecations and this would have been fantastic for that.
Lee: that's great; I think Evan has opinions on this too.
Evan: yeah we use paths internally and as part of our public deprecated API usage docs.
ACTION - Benjie - open this issue?


Note: Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group
meetings.

@benjie
Copy link
Member Author

benjie commented Feb 17, 2021

Have gathered together and written up various thoughts on this here: https://github.com/benjie/graphql-spec/blob/operation-expressions/rfcs/OperationExpressions.md - definitely encourage others to get involved.

@benjie benjie added the Ready for review 🙌 Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group meetings. label Feb 17, 2021
@leebyron leebyron closed this as completed Mar 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Action item 🎬 Ready for review 🙌 Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group meetings.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants