Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[2020-08-06] Clarify the problem that Field Coordinates is addressing #493

Closed
benjie opened this issue Sep 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

[2020-08-06] Clarify the problem that Field Coordinates is addressing #493

benjie opened this issue Sep 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
@magicmark
Labels
Action item 🎬 Ready for review 🙌 Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group meetings.

Comments

@benjie
Copy link
Member

benjie commented Sep 4, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Lee - For RFC to move forward, need to be clear about what problem we’re solving. Specify what this is for, and what this is not intended to be used for.
[ACTION - Mark] - clarify the above

Note: Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group
meetings.
@magicmark
Copy link
Contributor

magicmark commented Sep 4, 2020 •
edited
Loading

ack - got a draft going to revise the RFC!

(Apologies if this isn't done before the next meeting - if not, I won't attend, since I won't have any updates. I'm still trying to incorporate the feedback about it being more generalized (like a selector language), and keeping the door open for arguments and stuff.)

@benjie
Copy link
Member Author

benjie commented Sep 4, 2020

The meeting notes now have a link to the YouTube recording of the meeting in case it helps 👍

@magicmark
Copy link
Contributor

magicmark commented Sep 17, 2020 •
edited
Loading

I've updated the problem statement and added some (hopefully) extra crispy use cases :)

graphql/graphql-spec#746

Still working on a full breakdown of the spec (not sure how implementation detaily to get at this stage), but hopefully I've addressed this specific issue.

Thanks!

@benjie benjie added the Ready for review 🙌 Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group meetings. label Sep 17, 2020
magicmark added a commit to magicmark/graphql-wg that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2020
@magicmark
Add mark to October meeting
673f44d 
👋

I made some progress on the RFC - I've addressed graphql#493

Just checking to keep the momentum of this going, and clarify technical direction / implementation details for where to write spec proposal

thanks!
@magicmark magicmark mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2020
Merged
@leebyron leebyron closed this as completed Oct 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@magicmark magicmark

Labels
Action item 🎬 Ready for review 🙌 Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group meetings.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@leebyron @benjie @magicmark