fix(config): Copy Alibaba and IBM object storage configuration from common #14297
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xperimental
changed the title
periklis
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2024
xperimental
added
type/bug
3 tasks
3 tasks
jeschkies
pushed a commit
to jeschkies/loki
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2024
This was referenced Oct 14, 2024
This was referenced Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds code to the
config_wrapperfor copying object storage configuration for Alibaba Cloud / IBM Cloud from the common block to the ruler and storage configuration. This code was already present for other cloud providers, it looks as if these two were missed in the implementation.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
LOG-5325
Special notes for your reviewer:
release-3.1.xbranch.Checklist
CONTRIBUTING.mdguide (required)featPRs are unlikely to be accepted unless a case can be made for the feature actually being a bug fix to existing behavior.