-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: analytics view #84
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just some comments I think should be addressed:
- We should not use
dangerouslySetInnerHTML
, see my comment. We can also discuss in person for more detail - You have sometimes
Analytic
andsometimes
Analytics. Choose one, preferably
Analytics` (with the s).
🏀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the purpose of these changes exactly ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this PR!
I've added some suggestions, let's also check on dev how the sizing behaves with the overflow properties.
@@ -11,5 +12,5 @@ body { | |||
|
|||
#root { | |||
height: 100%; | |||
overflow: hidden; | |||
overflow: auto; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure about these changes, maybe let's look how it behaves in the development environment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice changes. I still have a suggestion to tighten the types and solve an issue you seem to have worked around related to index signatures.
Good work ! 🏆
closes #83