Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blocking in Chrome Incognito mode has no immediate effect to normal (non-Incognito) window ... #1188

Closed
Alpengreis opened this issue Jan 7, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@Alpengreis
Copy link

If I have to use the Chrome Incognito mode and block - for example - the iframes (3p frames) (including saving), then this has no immediate effect to the non-Incognito Window (3p frames are not blocked). AND vice-versa ... After close and reopen Chrome completely, it's blocked too.

And - just for info: changes in both modes in the same session (not really senseful in real life, I know), changes in Incognito mode are discarded after closing Chrome completely.

PS: uBO 1.5.3 with Chrome 47.0.2526.106 m (64-bit) on Win 10 Pro x64

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 7, 2016

Chrome's task manager says that uBO is an "anonymous" extension when in incognito. I suspect that means it's a separate instance and that's why the settings don't transfer immediately(?)

@gorhill
Copy link
Owner

gorhill commented Jan 7, 2016

Yes, in Chromium-based browsers, there are two separate instances, one for normal mode, the other for incognito mode.

There is no easy way to deal with this. "Fixing" this would force one instance to reload data from storage when the other instances change somethnig = nasty overhead + lots of code added just to deal with this (more code = more bugs, etc.). Last time I checked, you get similar behavior with the browser itself: changing some settings in one mode won't be reflected by settings from the other mode.

In short, I currently don't plan anything for this. There is also related issue #104 -- which I haven't decided whether this really needs "fixing".

@Alpengreis
Copy link
Author

Ok, at least I know the reason now. Thank you. I can handle this behaviour.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants