Spanner doesn't have support for auto-generating primary key values.
Therefore, django-google-spanner
monkey-patches AutoField
to generate a
random UUID4. It generates a default using Field
's default
option which
means AutoField
s will have a value when a model instance is created. For
example:
>>> ExampleModel() >>> ExampleModel.pk 4229421414948291880
To avoid hotspotting, these IDs are not monotonically increasing. This means that sorting models by ID isn't guaranteed to return them in the order in which they were created.
ForeignKey
constraints aren't created (#313)
Spanner does not support ON DELETE CASCADE
when creating foreign-key
constraints, so this is not supported in django-google-spanner
.
Spanner's support for Decimal types is limited to NUMERIC precision. Higher-precision values can be stored as strings instead.
This feature uses a column name that starts with an underscore
(_order
) which Spanner doesn't allow.
Spanner does not support it and will throw an exception. For example:
>>> ExampleModel.objects.order_by('?') ... django.db.utils.ProgrammingError: 400 Function not found: RANDOM ... FROM example_model ORDER BY RANDOM() ASC
There are some limitations on schema changes to consider:
- No support for renaming tables and columns;
- A column's type can't be changed;
- A table's primary key can't be altered.
DurationField
arithmetic doesn't work with DateField
values (#253)
Spanner requires using different functions for arithmetic depending on the column type:
TIMESTAMP
columns (DateTimeField
) requireTIMESTAMP_ADD
orTIMESTAMP_SUB
DATE
columns (DateField
) requireDATE_ADD
orDATE_SUB
Django does not provide ways to determine which database function to
use. DatabaseOperations.combine_duration_expression()
arbitrarily uses
TIMESTAMP_ADD
and TIMESTAMP_SUB
. Therefore, if you use a
DateField
in a DurationField
expression, you'll likely see an error
such as:
"No matching signature for function TIMESTAMP\_ADD for argument types: DATE, INTERVAL INT64 DATE\_TIME\_PART."
Spanner does not support this (#331) and will throw an error:
>>> ExampleModel.objects.update(integer=F('integer') / 2) ... django.db.utils.ProgrammingError: 400 Value of type FLOAT64 cannot be assigned to integer, which has type INT64 [at 1:46]\nUPDATE example_model SET integer = (example_model.integer /...
Additions cannot include None
values. For example:
>>> Book.objects.annotate(adjusted_rating=F('rating') + None) ... google.api_core.exceptions.InvalidArgument: 400 Operands of + cannot be literal NULL ...
Spanner supports stddev() and variance() functions (link).
Django’s Variance and StdDev database functions have 2 modes. One with full population STDDEV_POP and another with sample population STDDEV_SAMP and VAR_SAMP. Currently spanner only supports these functions with samples and not the full population STDDEV_POP,
Interleaving is a feature that is supported by spanner database link. But currently django spanner does not support this feature, more details on this is discussed in this github issue.
In django3.1 a new feature was introduced, <instance>._state.adding, this allowed spanner to resolve this bug.
But introduced a new issue with spanner django. Calling instance.save() an object after setting it's primary key to an existing primary key value, will cause a IntegrityError as follows: django.db.utils.IntegrityError: (1062, "Duplicate entry ....
The workaround for this is to update <instance>._state.adding to False. Example: .. code:: python
>>> # This test case passes. >>> def test_update_primary_with_default(self): >>> obj = PrimaryKeyWithDefault() >>> obj.save() >>> obj_2 = PrimaryKeyWithDefault(uuid=obj.uuid) >>> obj_2._state.adding = False >>> obj_2.save()>>> # This test case fails with `IntegrityError`. >>> def test_update_primary_with_default(self): >>> obj = PrimaryKeyWithDefault() >>> obj.save() >>> obj_2 = PrimaryKeyWithDefault(uuid=obj.uuid) >>> obj_2.save()
More details about this issue can be tracked here.
We have also added support for JSON object storage and retrieval with Django 3.2.x support in v2.2.1b4 release, but querying inside the JSONfield is not supported in the current django-google-spanner release. This feature is being worked on and can be tracked here.