Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration test with pyarrow nightly builds? #95

Closed
emkornfield opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #449
Closed

Integration test with pyarrow nightly builds? #95

emkornfield opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #449
Assignees
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like.

Comments

@emkornfield
Copy link

I'm not sure how difficult it would be to add, but it might be useful to regularly test the library against pyarrow nightly build's to catch regressions before they make their way into releases.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. label May 6, 2020
@plamut plamut added type: question Request for information or clarification. Not an issue. type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like. and removed type: question Request for information or clarification. Not an issue. labels May 6, 2020
@plamut
Copy link
Contributor

plamut commented May 6, 2020

@emkornfield That is something that is actually being discussed recently in a wider scope - the goal is to prevent regressions (not just in BigQuery) when a new version of a dependency (either Google's or from a 3rd party) breaks a client library that depends on it. It has already happened several times, and will happen again.

If/when such testing is in place, it would probably not be difficult to also include testing pre-release versions of a few selected 3rd-party dependencies, and pyarrow is probably a good candidate for that, considering its complexity.

I will keep this open for visibility, and thanks for suggesting it!

@tswast
Copy link
Contributor

tswast commented Nov 10, 2020

@crwilcox This seems like it'd fit with the pre-release tests infrastructure you mentioned in the Python Client Libs meeting today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants