Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add support for specifying stack type for clusters. This will allow clusters to be created as dual stack or toggled between IPV4 and dual stack #3781

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022

Conversation

gcf-owl-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot commented Dec 17, 2022

  • Regenerate this pull request now.

Clients can now configure dual stack clusters by specifying a stack type of IPV4_IPV6 during cluster creation, or with an update command. When used with a cluster creation command that creates a new subnet, the ipv6_access_type field can be used to specify whether the subnet has internal or external IPv6 access. When used with a cluster update command, the subnet must already be dual stack.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 495981345

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@9d1290e

Source-Link: https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis-gen/commit/31ed74bbd1990351a87bda1a4570ba08374281b7
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLWNvbnRhaW5lci8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiMzFlZDc0YmJkMTk5MDM1MWE4N2JkYTFhNDU3MGJhMDgzNzQyODFiNyJ9

…llow clusters to be created as dual stack or toggled between IPV4 and dual stack

Clients can now configure dual stack clusters by specifying a stack type of IPV4_IPV6 during cluster creation, or with an update command. When used with a cluster creation command that creates a new subnet, the ipv6_access_type field can be used to specify whether the subnet has internal or external IPv6 access. When used with a cluster update command, the subnet must already be dual stack.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 495981345

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@9d1290e

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@31ed74b
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLWNvbnRhaW5lci8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiMzFlZDc0YmJkMTk5MDM1MWE4N2JkYTFhNDU3MGJhMDgzNzQyODFiNyJ9
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 17, 2022 01:55
@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Dec 17, 2022

No region tags are edited in this PR.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 17, 2022

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 17, 2022

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 20, 2022

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 20, 2022

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 21, 2022

/gcbrun

@sofisl sofisl added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Dec 21, 2022
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 21, 2022

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 21, 2022

/gcbrun

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot merged commit 175d9d1 into main Dec 21, 2022
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot deleted the owl-bot-copy-packages-google-container branch December 21, 2022 20:58
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Dec 21, 2022
@release-please release-please bot mentioned this pull request Dec 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants