Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No information on how to upload the externally-hosted APK definition file #25

Open
hsolg opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@hsolg
Copy link

hsolg commented Nov 30, 2017

I can generate an APK definition file successfully, but I can not find any information here or anywhere else on how to upload this file to the Google Play Console.

@hdurer
Copy link
Contributor

hdurer commented Nov 30, 2017

Indeed this seems to be poorly documented (it is a very obscure and little used feature). There is a support article that you may want to check out.

I believe the following should work though:

  • Ensure that the Allow users to publish and update Google Play private apps. checkbox is set in the admin console. (Under Device managementAdvanced Settings in the section Google Play private apps.)
  • Then in the Play console make sure your app is marked as a private app. (Under Pricing & distribution in the Managed Google Play section set the checkmark for Privately target this app to a list of organizations.)
  • At that point you should have a new checkbox in the APKs to add section when adding an apk (under App releases).

Also have a look at blog post and the developers documentation for publishing via an API.

@hsolg
Copy link
Author

hsolg commented Nov 30, 2017

Thank you very much for the response! I don't have access to the admin console though, because I don't have a G Suite account. And I don't get a checkbox when I target the app privately for an organization. I also had a chat session today with Google developer support and they claimed it was impossible to self-host an app in this way. But publishing via an API as you mention at the end seems like a more promising option. I will try that instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants