Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 10, 2023. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
248 lines (194 loc) · 10.8 KB

02_data_store.md

File metadata and controls

248 lines (194 loc) · 10.8 KB

Lovefield Design Document

2. Data Store

In the beginning of Lovefield design, it was identified that two types of data stores need to exist: persistent data store for applications that need persistence, and volatile data store for remaining applications and testing. As time goes by, there are more needs to integrate with different persistent storage technologies. For example, the integration of Firebase allows developers to have the best of both worlds: a relational query engine on the browser-side, and a fully synchronized database among all clients on the Firebase server.

As a result, Lovefield uses a plug-in architecture for data stores. All data stores implement lf.BackStore interface so that query engine can be decoupled from actual storage technology.

For databases that features "upgrade mode", an lf.raw.BackStore interface is provided to handle that special case.

2.1 Common Nominator

All data stores has three methods in common:

  • init: indicate the initialization of a data store, which typically means establishing connection to a persisted instance. The database upgrade process is also initiated here when needed. The initialization also identifies maximum row id to-date and continue row id generation from there.

  • createTx: return a transaction object from data store, and hint the data store that an atomic writing operation is going to happen. The transaction will be associated with a unique journal which will guarantee all the changes are flushed at once. Lovefield only requires the data store to support atomic writes. Lovefield manages its own transactions and will group all writes of a transaction into one single flush.

  • close: closes the connection to persisted instance. This call is best-effort due to technical limitations (e.g. both IndexedDB and WebSQL have no reliable close call).

2.2 Memory Store

Memory store internally is a lf.structs.Map which maps table name to table. The table is also a lf.structs.Map that maps row id to the lf.Row object of that table. The memory store transaction is a naive Promise that will resolve on commit and reject on abort.

2.3 IndexedDB Store

There are some interesting caveats caused by IndexedDB specification, and they affects the specification design of Lovefield quite a bit. The features that affect Lovefield design are listed below:

  1. Auto commit: IndexedDB will automatically commit the transaction if the transaction has gone out of its message loop. For example, an XHR call to the server in IndexedDB event callback will effectively commit the transaction.

  2. Upgrade: IndexedDB schema can only be changed in the handler of onupgradeneeded event. The event can only be triggered when database is opened. As a result, to alter schema of Lovefield database, one can only do it during initialization time. IndexedDB does not provide a way of renaming table, therefore renaming a table will require recreating a table with exact contents and deleting the old table, which cannot be done safely within the upgrade transaction and user is supposed to do it manually outside of the onUpgrade function.

  3. Best effort closing: IndexedDB does not guarantee the database fully closed if there are connections to the database. As a result, Lovefield could not offer a reliable way to ensure a database instance has brought down completely and then opens it again to alter schema.

  4. First writer wins: IndexedDB supports multiple connections, which means multiple processes/tabs can connect to the same database instance. IndexedDB currently does not provide any cross-process locking and therefore the first writer reaches the database will win, and the other writers with conflict scope will be rolled back. IndexedDB also does not offer observer/events for changes caused by other session/process/tab.

  5. Event happy: IndexedDB offers a variety of events for the developer to listen and utilize. Unfortunately this also means a lot of unused events fired by the browser during bulk load. If the database has more than 10K rows in a single table, users need to consider using experimental bundled mode to improve app loading time.

Lovefield wraps IndexedDB objects in different classes:

IndexedDB objects Wrapper
IDBDatabase lf.backstore.IndexedDB and lf.backstore.IndexedDBRawBackstore (for onupgrade helpers).
IDBTransaction lf.backstore.IndexedDBTx
IDBObjectStore lf.backstore.ObjectStore and lf.backstore.BundledObjectStore (for bundled mode).

The goals of the wrapper:

  • Provide a cross-browser shim that minimize browser-dependent code.
  • Handle transaction auto-commit for users.
  • Use best practice to obtain best performance.
  • Handle upgrade process in a more elegant way.

Each IndexedDB transaction is associated with a Journal object. The Journal object will carry all changes performed in a logical lf.Transaction object, and flush them all at once via the physical IndexedDB transaction object when the logical transaction is committed. As a result, the IndexedDB transaction object is named Tx throughout the code to distinguish from the logical transaction object.

2.3.1 Storage Format

The data will be stored in IndexedDB using following hierarchy

  • The whole database will be stored in an IndexedDB using database's name
  • Each table corresponds to an object store
  • Each row corresponds to an object in object store. A row contains two fields:
    • id: unique row id across database
    • value: actual payload of the row, each field in this object corresponds to a column in schema

2.3.2 Bundled Mode Experiment

In bundled mode, Lovefield will store rows differently. Internally Lovefield assigns a unique row id to each logical row. In bundled mode, Lovefield will bundle multiple (up to 512) logical rows into one physical row in IndexedDB.

Per current IndexedDB spec, the only way to load all rows from an IndexedDB table is

var req = objectStore.openCursor();
req.onsuccess = function() {
  if (cursor) {
    // get one row by using cursor.value
    cursor.continue();
  } else {
    // finished
  }
};

This code snippet involves N calls of cursor.continue and N eventing of onsuccess, which is very expensive when N is big. WebKit needs 57us for firing an event on an HP Z620, and the wall clock time for loading 100K rows just for firing N onsuccess events will be 5.7 seconds, not to mention the callback processing time. Lovefield provides this bundled mode to accelerate initial bootstrapping speed by bundling logical rows together. There can be other performance-related consequences for this approach and thus this feature is marked as experimental.

Users who enabled bundled mode needs to keep the following facts in mind:

  • Writing or updating a row for bundled mode is slower, because it needs to pay the tax of extra grouping. Benchmark shows that updating 10K rows is about 300-500 ms slower. In exchange, the bulk load is many seconds faster.
  • Bundled mode is designed mainly for data tables with 10K+ rows. Smaller database may experience slower performance by enabling bundle mode. User is supposed to benchmark and determine if bundled mode is feasible.
  • To convert non-bundled to bundled database or the other way around:
    • db.export() to get the JavaScript representation of the whole database
    • Completely delete the original database using window.deleteDatabase()
    • Recreate the database again using connect()
    • Use db.import() to import previously exported data
  • Bundled database is harder to examine via developer tools. The pages serialize the payload as string before storing them. This is done so because of way greater performance in Chrome (tested on v39.0.2171.36) for large JSON objects.

2.4 Firebase Store

Lovefield can sit on top of Firebase. Lovefield uses Firebase as a cloud backstore. As a result, one must follow these three rules when use Lovefield on top of Firebase:

  1. All clients accessing the database must use Lovefield.
  2. Only one client can be used to create the database.
  3. Database upgrade needs to be carried out in a different manner: clients other than the upgrading one must not be using the database shall there be a database upgrade (this is typically done using Firebase security control instead).

2.4.1 Storage Format

For performance reasons, Lovefield stores data in Firebase very differently. The store is structured like this:

<schema_name>: {
  "@rev": {
    R: <N>,
  },
  "@db": {
    version: <schema version>
  },
  "@table": {
    <table_name>: <table_id>
  },
  <row id 1>: { R: <N1>, T: <T1>, P: <object1> },
  <row id 2>: { R: <N2>, T: <T2>, P: <object2> },
  ...
}

R stands for revision, T stands for table id, and P stands for payload. It's abbreviated to ensure optimal over-the-wire transmission.

2.5 WebSQL Store

DEPRECATED. Please upgrade to Safari 10 and stop using this data store.

2.5.1 Storage Format

WebSQL stores data similar to IndexedDB's structure:

  • The whole database will be stored in a WebSQL instance using database's name
  • A special table named __lf_ver that stores metadata for the whole database
  • Each table corresponds to a WebSQL table
  • Each row corresponds to a row in WebSQL table. A row contains two fields:
    • id: unique row id across database
    • value: serialized JSON string of the row's payload

2.6 Database Upgrade

The upgrade process is triggered by bumping up the schema version. Lovefield will open the database using updated number, and in turn IndexedDB will fire the onupgradeneeded event. In that event, Lovefield will

  1. create tables (i.e. objectstores) which exist in schema but not in IndexedDB
  2. wrap the database connection into lf.backstore.IndexedDBRawBackstore
  3. call user-provided onUpgrade function with the wrapped instance

This design still exposes the user under the risk of accidentally auto-commit. However, there existed no known better alternative that works cross-browser.

2.7 External Change

Contents inside a data store can be changed by other sessions or even other clients. Most data stores lack external change notifications. As a result, for cross-tab implementations, one need to use Web Worker or Service Worker to host the database. Lovefield team is aware of this problem and working closely with IndexedDB team to pursue a change notification standard for IndexedDB.

Local Storage and Firebase change notifications to inform Lovefield that the contents have changed by external sources. By default, Lovefield listens to these changes, and will update

  • Database cache
  • Indices
  • Observed queries