Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Athiti #9048

Open
emmamarichal opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Update Athiti #9048

emmamarichal opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
-- fontforge/fontlab/fontcreator sources that are not UFO/Glyphs natively I Font Upgrade

Comments

@emmamarichal
Copy link
Collaborator

Font Project Git Repo URL:

A PR has been opened by a user, but there are a lot of fails that should be easily fixed: #9044

This PR is an attempt at correcting issue #9043 using FontForge. As I have no experience with FontForge, I will describe my process: I simply opened the TTF files for each variant, measured the height of the U+201A shape, and used the Transform dialog to move the U+201E shape to the same height. I then executed File → Generate Fonts to produce new versions of the TTF files. For every variant, there were two warnings. The first informed me about a convention that TrueType fonts should have an em-size that is a power of 2, while these fonts have 1000. The second was “Missing points at Extrema” for various glyphs (quotedbl, quotesingle, parenleft, parenright, braceleft, braceright, uni0E04, uni0E05, uni0E28, uni0E56, minute, second – so seemingly not the glyph that I was changing). I chose to ignore these.

ISSUE
#9043

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-- fontforge/fontlab/fontcreator sources that are not UFO/Glyphs natively I Font Upgrade
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant