You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Open photivo
2. Try to do realistic tone-mapping of HDR RAW file.
3. Get sad by the results with Fattal :(
4. Read http://www.frank-durr.de/tonemapping_comparison.html
5. Realize that Durand does seem like the best for most* cases after trying his
software with my images.
6. Read Durand et al's explanation of the algorithm:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/fredo/PUBLI/Siggraph2002/
7. Realize that photivo is already using Bilateral filters everywhere.
8. Decide that it's worth creating a new feature request :)
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
1. Open photivo
2. Try to do realistic tone-mapping.
3. Be happy with the results.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
A Mar 26th build from the repo... but I doubt it's been implemented yet anyway.
Please provide any additional information below.
It seems that is just a matter of using BF to separate low and high frequencies
in a logarithmic space of the L channel, apply a simple contrast reduction on
the low frequency (multiply by some factor), and reconstruct the image back
into linear after adding the low and high freqs.
Is also worth reading: http://people.csail.mit.edu/sparis/bf/
Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 8 Jun 2013 at 9:12
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
[email protected]
on 8 Jun 2013 at 9:12The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: