Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consistency of the UX (in team view) #2691

Closed
hubyhuby opened this issue Oct 12, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5457
Closed

consistency of the UX (in team view) #2691

hubyhuby opened this issue Oct 12, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5457
Labels
topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Milestone

Comments

@hubyhuby
Copy link

hubyhuby commented Oct 12, 2017

This is a feature request for 1.2
The main idea is that same looking things shall have the same type of action.
In team view for example:
The way we display "1 repository" is a link, which is counter intuitive. Because the behavior of such link every where else is to bring you to another page... Which in this case means AWAY from the team configuration page. Samething for "2 members"
Therefore when you arrive on this page, you think there is only one parameter to a team, which is "members"'

gui-git

The UX could look like in other places, see for example this kinda mockup for team :

correctgui

@hubyhuby hubyhuby changed the title consistency of the UX consistency of the UX (in team view) Oct 12, 2017
@lunny lunny added type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI labels Oct 12, 2017
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.7.0 milestone Dec 8, 2018
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants