You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
I noticed that for some go vulnerabilities, the vulnerability references a go package,
and not a go module.
For example, GHSA-pmw9-567p-68pc references the package github.com/cloudflare/cfrpki/cmd/octorpki, while the associated go module is github.com/cloudflare/cfrpki.
Note that some advisories reference both package and module, such as GHSA-74fp-r6jw-h4mp.
This is a bit troublesome, as go.mod files reference modules, so we need to find the module that contains a package
in order to know if a module is vulnerable.
Moreover, if a vulnerability references a package (inside a module), it is possible for the package to be later shadowed
by a module of the same name. In this case, the vulnerability would reference the wrong module.
From basic queries on the proxy.golang.org, it seems that about 20% of go packages referenced in (reviewed) advisories reference a non-existing module (which is most likely a package inside a module). This concerns 1010 advisories in total.
Do you think this is an issue that should be acted upon ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I noticed that for some go vulnerabilities, the vulnerability references a go package,
and not a go module.
For example, GHSA-pmw9-567p-68pc references the package
github.com/cloudflare/cfrpki/cmd/octorpki
, while the associated go module isgithub.aaakk.us.kg/cloudflare/cfrpki
.Note that some advisories reference both package and module, such as GHSA-74fp-r6jw-h4mp.
This is a bit troublesome, as
go.mod
files reference modules, so we need to find the module that contains a packagein order to know if a module is vulnerable.
Moreover, if a vulnerability references a package (inside a module), it is possible for the package to be later shadowed
by a module of the same name. In this case, the vulnerability would reference the wrong module.
From basic queries on the
proxy.golang.org
, it seems that about 20% of go packages referenced in (reviewed) advisories reference a non-existing module (which is most likely a package inside a module). This concerns 1010 advisories in total.Do you think this is an issue that should be acted upon ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: