Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Taxon constraint: GO:0015039 | NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase activity #27715

Closed
ValWood opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Taxon constraint: GO:0015039 | NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase activity #27715

ValWood opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Apr 24, 2024

Please provide as much information as you can:

  • GO term ID label:

These annotations are still present, I will raise a taxon restriction for
GO:0015039 | NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase activity
I need to double check species distribution. Andredoxin seems to be present in some fungi, but not pombe or cerevisiae.

  • Request to add a taxon constraint:

    • **only in taxon: **
    • **never in taxon: **
  • Request to remove a taxon constraint:
    Please specify

  • Supporting evidence if available (e.g PMID):

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Apr 24, 2024

From a quick glance, adrenodoxin reductase seems to be a gene-product specific name for ferridoxin-reductase?

Screenshot 2024-04-24 at 09 35 04

NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase activity also has a comment:
Note that this term specifically refers to the reaction proceeding in the direction shown; under physiological conditions adrenodoxin reduction by adrenodoxin reductase is coupled with electron transfer from AdR to P450, which catalyzes an irreversible monooxygenation reaction. This term should therefore be used to annotate gene products that catalyze the reduction of oxidized adrenodoxin; also consider annotating to the molecular function term 'ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase activity; GO:0004324'.

I haven't yet found out exactly which cytochrome adrenodoxin refers to and if yeast have it. I keep finding adrenodoxin == ferridoxin...

@ValWood ValWood self-assigned this May 21, 2024
@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 24, 2024

@deustp01 do you know anything about
NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase activity

@deustp01
Copy link

deustp01 commented Jun 24, 2024

My vague overview understanding is that many enzymes that mediate oxidation-reductiion reactions on small-molecule substrates (sterols and drugs are popular ones) have bound cofactors like iron-sulfur clusters and others I know even less about, that are reduced-oxidized in the course of the reaction. That of course inactivates the enzyme. For reactivation it needs to undergo a reaction in which that bound cofactor is re-oxidized or re-reduced. Adrenodoxins, which also definitely exist in mammals - see this UniProt entry for a human one), and examine its first linked RHEA reaction - can mediate this cofactor regeneration for iron-sulfur clusters.

A confusing factor for me is that textbook diagrams of oxidation-reduction reactions often represent iron-sulfer clusters and FAD/FMN as entities in their own right, not as cofactor components of a protein or protein complex.

On this view, I guess adrenodoxin activity is required for the textbook oxidation of a sterol or a drug, but indirectly, as the agent responsible for maintaining the gene product that does the actual chemistry in its active state.

Beyond that, I am also still struggling to understand how these things work.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 24, 2024

Since adrenodoxin appears to be a speicific type of ferridoxin, found in adrenal cells, I will add a taxon restriction for fungi

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jun 25, 2024

There already is a TC - did you forget to link the ticket when you did the work?

Thanks, Pascale

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jun 25, 2024

I probably did it when I was trying to edit taxon constraints in VSC (which meant they got pulled into a pull request , but might not of had a term tracker item)
I now do these in the web editor again, which is OK, and easier to keep track of I think my issue was that I didn't realise there was a final tab in the file!

Anyway closing this. I still think this should probably be is_a ferredoxin but I'll leave that to somebody who knows more.....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants