Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation for generated C++ #12

Closed
osrf-migration opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Documentation for generated C++ #12

osrf-migration opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
boost the docs Documentation deployment, usability and parity with classic documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@osrf-migration
Copy link

Original report (archived issue) by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina).


See this gazebo issue

And this question

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina).


Besides the API page being broken on http://gazebosim.org/api as mentioned above, the new
https://ignitionrobotics.org website doesn't even have a section for the messages API: https://ignitionrobotics.org/api/msgs/3.0/index.html

@osrf-migration osrf-migration added major enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 15, 2020
@chapulina chapulina added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation and removed major labels May 25, 2020
@chapulina chapulina added the boost the docs Documentation deployment, usability and parity with classic label Aug 10, 2020
@ahcorde ahcorde self-assigned this Aug 13, 2020
@ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor

ahcorde commented Aug 13, 2020

I create a new argument called AUTOGENERATED_DOC in ign-cmake to be be able to include the directory where the autogenerated code is saved. gazebosim/gz-cmake#108

This other PR makes use of this new feature

@chapulina
Copy link
Contributor

Done on #76. See #77 for actually documenting that API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
boost the docs Documentation deployment, usability and parity with classic documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants