Evaluate hard-source-webpack-plugin

[KyleAMathews]

Has anyone tried https://github.com/amireh/happypack?

Curious if it could be adopted to Gatsby for reducing build times.

[KyleAMathews]

And hard-source https://github.com/mzgoddard/hard-source-webpack-plugin

[thangngoc89]

Hi @KyleAMathews , I implemented hard source webpack plugin for Phenomic and I must say the result is awesome. It boosts build time up to 300%. But happypack isn't working with hard-source those.

[KyleAMathews]

Nice! It seems super promising. How plug-n-play did you find it?

[thangngoc89]

100% plug-n-play. There were some bugs, we reported it and a patch was released immediately.

[stereobooster]

Webpack 2.0 https://webpack.github.io/docs/roadmap.html? It promise tree shacking for ES6

[fabien0102]

I have a tried with fusebox, it's very fast (50ms for a react project)! (but less modules as webpack when I tried) @KyleAMathews If you want have a try with gatsby, it can be cool 😉

[KyleAMathews]

We're pretty tightly integrated with webpack... so switching off would be a big project. Would love faster hot reloading but all the goodies in webpack and the breath of the ecosystem are really hard to beat.

[fabien0102]

It was just a proposition for "evaluation", I was really impressed by the hot-reload reactivity with fusebox (it's just instant!), but I understand that all of our ecosystem is based on webpack ^^

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity.