We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
加入的标准主要是:便于入门、理解;主题不限于特定技术。如果本身写得难以理解,那可视化其实是个鸡肋;如果每种技术实现都加入,整个清单会显得很臃肿:教编程语言的教程一堆;前端框架的Playground也至少有几十种;不同编程语言的算法教程也不少。
举例来说,不会考虑只教Python程序设计的,但是会考虑用多种语言演示算法的Algorithm Visualizer;不会考虑Svelte这个特定框架的教程,但是如果有人用某种框架讲解计算机图形学,那也可以考虑加入清单。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
再三考虑之后,决定不将主题散乱的博客纳入,如:
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
加入的标准主要是:便于入门、理解;主题不限于特定技术。如果本身写得难以理解,那可视化其实是个鸡肋;如果每种技术实现都加入,整个清单会显得很臃肿:教编程语言的教程一堆;前端框架的Playground也至少有几十种;不同编程语言的算法教程也不少。
举例来说,不会考虑只教Python程序设计的,但是会考虑用多种语言演示算法的Algorithm Visualizer;不会考虑Svelte这个特定框架的教程,但是如果有人用某种框架讲解计算机图形学,那也可以考虑加入清单。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: