-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Harmonize authorize to AIP-040 #34
Comments
@jennijuju To discuss |
Hey, sorry for the reply. I would stay with |
For the second part, are you suggesting |
Great. We should also use revokeOperator for AIP040, right? Yes, in ERC-721 it does not mean anything to authorize yourself. And Of course we don't need to follow that. But I do want to have 40 and 41 synchronized. |
Full comparison
|
At the moment following are all differences:
|
Authorize/deauthorize or authorize/revoke.
Also the specification "An address MUST always be an operator for itself. Hence an address MUST NOT ever be revoked as its own operator." can be harmonized.
To discuss.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: