Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move inferences to lower level of implicits, fixes #990 #994

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 19, 2021

Conversation

matwojcik
Copy link
Contributor

It fixes #990

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #994 (64271a7) into master (16d5a9d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #994   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.39%   92.39%           
=======================================
  Files          63       63           
  Lines         815      815           
  Branches        6        9    +3     
=======================================
  Hits          753      753           
  Misses         62       62           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...c/main/scala-3.0-/eu/timepit/refined/boolean.scala 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 16d5a9d...64271a7. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Owner

@fthomas fthomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Many thanks @matwojcik!

@fthomas fthomas merged commit 0dfb19e into fthomas:master Jul 19, 2021
@fthomas fthomas added the bug label Jul 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistency between 0.9.25 and 0.9.26 versions - possible regression
2 participants