Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Generic Thing missing? #113

Open
diRk262 opened this issue Nov 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Create Generic Thing missing? #113

diRk262 opened this issue Nov 21, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@diRk262
Copy link

diRk262 commented Nov 21, 2021

Hi,
if I remember correctly it was possible in OH2 to create a generic thing with the GUI to use unsupported EEP‘s.

Is this option not longer available in OH3? The documentation still says you can create a generic thing, but I can’t find an option for this?

OH2:

Thank you!

Best regards Dirk

@fruggy83
Copy link
Owner

Hi Dirk @diRk262

since OH3 GenericThings cannot be created with the GUI any longer. As these things should only be used in rare cases, I unlisted them. However in OH2 you had the option to show all thing types of a binding (like the advanced channels). This option is gone in OH3.

I plan to change the channels of a GenericThing to be extensible. So you can add more than one Number channel for example. I will remove the "unlist" flag with this change too. In the meantime you have to add your GenericThings by file.

Best regards
Daniel

@diRk262
Copy link
Author

diRk262 commented Nov 21, 2021

Hi Daniel @fruggy83 ,
Thank you for the response and clarification.

It was my fear that this option is gone in OH3 :(
I am not familiar with textual definition, I set up all of my things and itmes with the GUI.

My plan is to create a virtual BiDi Peha actuator and control it with a 450 FU-HS128 remote. For this I need to receive the remote‘s telegram and send the confirmation telegram from openhab to the remote. So it is vica versa compared to a real actuator because openhab needs to be acting like the actuator. Maybe this will be doable with a generic thing.

I will take a look for some documentation how I can create the generic thing, use the unsupported EEP‘s and transform it to my needs.

Thank you for your work.
Best regards Dirk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants