Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CSV Params standard #24

Closed
rufuspollock opened this issue Feb 15, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

CSV Params standard #24

rufuspollock opened this issue Feb 15, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

Distil this from e.g. python etc
@mk270
Copy link
Contributor

mk270 commented Feb 19, 2013

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmU3V2vcPKrIdEhoU1NQSWtoQmJwcUNCelJtdkx2bFE&usp=sharing

@mk270 mk270 mentioned this issue Feb 19, 2013
Closed
@mk270
Copy link
Contributor

mk270 commented Feb 19, 2013

We should probably just do as @onyxfish suggests in wireservice/csvkit#184 and use the python csv module arguments (though one of these is an enum which won't translate to JSON)

@mk270
Copy link
Contributor

mk270 commented Feb 24, 2013

Ok,

We need dates for "supported until" and "frozen until", e..g., +12 months, +3 months, and a list of software we'll support it in

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor Author

FIXED. See http://www.dataprotocols.org/en/latest/csv-dialect.html

roll added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
@roll @peterdesmet
Added field.missingValues (#24)
bf64a58 
* Added missing values per field

* Improved explanation and added an example

* Updated styling

* Replace `cascading` by `combining`

Co-authored-by: Peter Desmet <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Peter Desmet <[email protected]>
@peterdesmet peterdesmet mentioned this issue Jul 3, 2024
Open
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
Open Knowledge
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rufuspollock @mk270