feat: gotestsum #150
Merged
feat: gotestsum #150
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fredrikaverpil
force-pushed
the
gotestsum
branch
10 times, most recently
from
7eb8d6a to
289ef5d
Compare
fredrikaverpil
commented
Jul 22, 2024
fredrikaverpil
commented
Jul 22, 2024
fredrikaverpil
force-pushed
the
gotestsum
branch
from
289ef5d to
5bd3cf5
Compare
2 tasks
fredrikaverpil
force-pushed
the
gotestsum
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ef747f5 to
e931b9c
Compare
fredrikaverpil
force-pushed
the
gotestsum
branch
from
e931b9c to
1de2209
Compare
fredrikaverpil
commented
Aug 10, 2024
2 tasks
fredrikaverpil
force-pushed
the
gotestsum
branch
from
1de2209 to
a08bf4c
Compare
fredrikaverpil
force-pushed
the
gotestsum
branch
from
a08bf4c to
57a337e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds documentation around running tests using
gotestsum, which is already implemented in themainbranch.My original plan was to research output streaming before exposing the capability of configuring
gotestsum, because it could end up dictating how the configuration around it would be like. But #149 sped up this process a bit, as it seems like a requirement on Windows with Powershell, hence this PR. However, I'll still keep this in draft for now, as I'm still not 100% sure about how I wantgotestsumto be configured. There might also be a need to support custom test runners which could affect how configuration aroundgoteststumand the defaultgowould look like. All in all, this PR adds transparency on the subject.