Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unittests to increase test coverage #94

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

sschlenkrich
Copy link
Member

@sschlenkrich sschlenkrich commented Nov 29, 2024

With this PR we add test cases to cover implmentation edge cases:

  • Add PathMethods tests
  • Add interest rate coupon payoffs tests
  • Add serialisation tests for edge cases
  • Add edge cases tests for reference rate volatlity and correlation
  • Add additional Valuations tests

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.03%. Comparing base (9df98cb) to head (55846a2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #94      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.26%   99.03%   +0.77%     
==========================================
  Files          78       78              
  Lines        4265     4265              
==========================================
+ Hits         4191     4224      +33     
+ Misses         74       41      -33     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

  - Add PathMethods tests
  - Add interest rate coupon payoffs tests
  - Add serialisation tests for edge cases
  - Add edge cases tests for reference rate volatlity and correlation
  - Add additional Valuations tests
@sschlenkrich sschlenkrich merged commit e36132b into frame-consulting:main Dec 6, 2024
6 checks passed
@sschlenkrich sschlenkrich deleted the wip/more-tests branch December 6, 2024 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants