You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With Unlocked packages it becomes really simple to prepare reusable libraries, however this reuseability drops significantly since intellisense does not work on them.
If it was a regular class, it would easily work, but unless you have codecomplete support for packages, it comes pointless since you would either have to remember everything from it or copy/paste.
Describe the solution you'd like
I could imagine a few outcomes.
download the whole package into a hidden location and index it in the server
add a config to the sfdx-config.json file a list of packageVersion Ids, from which you could build the index
I am not sure if this is a bug or a new feature, but whoever I asked, nobody can use intellisense on packages. please add some sort of support for this. we really need this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @ikljaic-nubilum - working with unlocked packages is definitely something we've heard our users would like support for! It looks like your request is a duplicate of #2075 - let us know if your request is different and we can keep this one open though.
@randi274 Seems to me to be the same request, that is already 3 years long. It would be amazing if there was some progress after 3 years, with something that is so basic for developers. This is something that drives developer satisfaction/addoption and improvement.
If you can make us developers more productive, it will make the business more happy and more willing to spend money on SF licences.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With Unlocked packages it becomes really simple to prepare reusable libraries, however this reuseability drops significantly since intellisense does not work on them.
If it was a regular class, it would easily work, but unless you have codecomplete support for packages, it comes pointless since you would either have to remember everything from it or copy/paste.
Describe the solution you'd like
I could imagine a few outcomes.
sfdx-config.json
file a list of packageVersion Ids, from which you could build the indexI am not sure if this is a bug or a new feature, but whoever I asked, nobody can use intellisense on packages. please add some sort of support for this. we really need this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: