Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intellisense/codecomplete/autocomplete on packages #4725

Closed
ikljaic-nubilum opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

Intellisense/codecomplete/autocomplete on packages #4725

ikljaic-nubilum opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@ikljaic-nubilum
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With Unlocked packages it becomes really simple to prepare reusable libraries, however this reuseability drops significantly since intellisense does not work on them.
If it was a regular class, it would easily work, but unless you have codecomplete support for packages, it comes pointless since you would either have to remember everything from it or copy/paste.

Describe the solution you'd like
I could imagine a few outcomes.

  • download the whole package into a hidden location and index it in the server
  • add a config to the sfdx-config.json file a list of packageVersion Ids, from which you could build the index

I am not sure if this is a bug or a new feature, but whoever I asked, nobody can use intellisense on packages. please add some sort of support for this. we really need this.

@ikljaic-nubilum
Copy link
Author

Or is there at least a CLI command that I can point the server into the direction on what to index.

@ikljaic-nubilum
Copy link
Author

any updates? anyone?

@ikljaic-nubilum
Copy link
Author

@AnanyaJha

@randi274
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ikljaic-nubilum - working with unlocked packages is definitely something we've heard our users would like support for! It looks like your request is a duplicate of #2075 - let us know if your request is different and we can keep this one open though.

@ikljaic-nubilum
Copy link
Author

@randi274 Seems to me to be the same request, that is already 3 years long. It would be amazing if there was some progress after 3 years, with something that is so basic for developers. This is something that drives developer satisfaction/addoption and improvement.
If you can make us developers more productive, it will make the business more happy and more willing to spend money on SF licences.

@randi274
Copy link
Contributor

💯 agree! Thanks for the speedy response too - we've re-prioritized that ticket, and will keep you updated on the status over there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants