Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cannot create GitRepository with Include feature #163

Closed
jeffwestaway opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Cannot create GitRepository with Include feature #163

jeffwestaway opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
area/docs Documentation related issues and pull requests question Further information is requested

Comments

@jeffwestaway
Copy link

Hi Team,

It doesn't appear that there is any way for this provider to leverage the Include feature from the source-controller to map a GitRepository into another GitRepository. (fluxcd/source-controller#348).

Does anyone know if there is a way of currently leveraging this type of manifest with the current iteration?

@phillebaba
Copy link
Member

Is there a specific use case that you have in mind?

@phillebaba phillebaba added question Further information is requested area/docs Documentation related issues and pull requests labels Jul 12, 2021
@jeffwestaway
Copy link
Author

Current use case is base templates are in one repository, but overlays and kustomizations are in another.
Looking to leverage this so that the terraform provider will create the initial gotk-sync.yaml file with the second repo to be included as well, and set up the from path and to path in the initial repo manifest.

@phillebaba
Copy link
Member

Would using a custom Kustomization file as described in #178 solve this issue?

@swade1987
Copy link
Member

@jeffwestaway just making sure you managed to resolve this. If so, are you happy for us to close the issue?

@swade1987
Copy link
Member

Hi @jeffwestaway 👋

I hope you are doing well! As part of our ongoing effort to maintain and improve the quality of our project, I've been reviewing open issues and came across the one you've reported. First off, thank you for taking the time to contribute by reporting this issue; your input is crucial to us.

Upon reviewing the details of your issue, I noticed that it involves the use of a resource or feature that has yet to be supported since the 1.0.0 release of our project, which was approximately 9 months ago. This might be a key factor in the challenges you're experiencing. We understand that changes and deprecations can impact your work, and we're here to help navigate these transitions. If there are specific reasons you've continued using this unsupported resource or if there's any way we can assist in migrating to a supported alternative, please let us know.

Additionally, to ensure the efficient management of our issue tracker and to focus on issues that are actively affecting our community, we have implemented a policy for issues that remain inactive. If there is no activity on this issue within the next 3 weeks, we will consider the issue inactive and close it for you. This doesn't mean your issue is not important to us, but rather that we aim to keep our focus on actively pursued concerns. Of course, if the issue continues or if you have further updates in the future, feel free to reopen the issue or create a new one.

Thank you once again for your contribution to our project. Your feedback not only helps us improve but also supports the broader community in overcoming similar challenges. We look forward to hearing from you and hope to resolve any outstanding concerns together.

Best regards,

Steve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docs Documentation related issues and pull requests question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants