Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix race condition in FlutterSurfaceManager #27828

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2021

Conversation

knopp
Copy link
Member

@knopp knopp commented Jul 30, 2021

There is a small window in which the onIdle timer might not be
cancelled so it needs to be guarded with a synchronized variable.

flutter/flutter#87353

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide and the C++, Objective-C, Java style guides.
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am adding, or Hixie said the PR is test-exempt. See testing the engine for instructions on
    writing and running engine tests.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I signed the CLA.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

There is a small window in which the onIdle timer might not be
cancelled so it needs to be guarded with a synchronized variable.
@flutter-dashboard
Copy link

It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat.

If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix?

Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing.

Copy link
Contributor

@iskakaushik iskakaushik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@iskakaushik iskakaushik added the waiting for tree to go green This PR is approved and tested, but waiting for the tree to be green to land. label Aug 2, 2021
@fluttergithubbot fluttergithubbot merged commit 86c6255 into flutter:master Aug 2, 2021
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2021
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2021
naudzghebre pushed a commit to naudzghebre/engine that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
filmil pushed a commit to filmil/engine that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes needs tests platform-macos waiting for tree to go green This PR is approved and tested, but waiting for the tree to be green to land.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants