Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use indexer directly [JS-842] #1069

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024
Merged

feat: use indexer directly [JS-842] #1069

merged 41 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

shamsartem
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Base automatically changed from refactor to main November 8, 2024 14:26
@shamsartem shamsartem requested a review from MixailE November 12, 2024 09:54
@shamsartem shamsartem changed the title feat: use indexer directly feat: use indexer directly [JS-842] Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

linear bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Copy link

@MixailE MixailE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

I've tested several commands: delegator collateral-withdraw, delegator reward-withdraw, delegator collateral-add, provider cc-info, provider deal-exit and e.t.c

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's split this file into smaller ones

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you don't mind I will think about doing that in a separate PR. I think splitting the code in multiple files doesn't solve any concrete issues, more of a matter of a taste thing, though I could be wrong and I agree this file is pretty big already. On the other hand it still seems ok to work with and as a bonus doesn't require you to jump between many files when working with commitments, which is pretty convenient

@shamsartem shamsartem merged commit 05ab854 into main Nov 28, 2024
9 checks passed
@shamsartem shamsartem deleted the indexer branch November 28, 2024 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants