Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verify Voucher locks in VoucherValidUnlocked #5609

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 28, 2021
Merged

Verify Voucher locks in VoucherValidUnlocked #5609

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 28, 2021

Conversation

Kubuxu
Copy link
Contributor

@Kubuxu Kubuxu commented Feb 16, 2021

No description provided.

@Kubuxu Kubuxu requested a review from dirkmc February 16, 2021 12:30
@magik6k magik6k marked this pull request as draft February 19, 2021 11:23
@Kubuxu Kubuxu marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2021 12:56
Copy link
Contributor

@magik6k magik6k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good assuming it doesn't break anything, lint is unhappy though

@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ func (pm *Manager) trackInboundChannel(ctx context.Context, ch address.Address)
return pm.store.TrackChannel(stateCi)
}

// TODO: secret vs proof doesn't make sense, there is only one, not two
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we had both at some point in the past

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We did. But it wasn't usable so we removed it from actors.

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kubuxu commented Mar 25, 2021

Lint is not happy due to there being extra function in tests. In future, it might be used.

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kubuxu commented Jul 14, 2021

@jennijuju can you take a look at getting this merged. I thought it was merged ages ago.

Jakub Sztandera added 3 commits July 27, 2021 09:10
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sztandera <[email protected]>
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ func (pm *Manager) trackInboundChannel(ctx context.Context, ch address.Address)
return pm.store.TrackChannel(stateCi)
}

// TODO: secret vs proof doesn't make sense, there is only one, not two
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We did. But it wasn't usable so we removed it from actors.

paychmgr/paych.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@Kubuxu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kubuxu commented Jul 28, 2021

@Stebalien are you still requesting changes here or did we clear it up?

Copy link
Member

@Stebalien Stebalien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'll need a bit of followup work, but this is a strict improvement.

@Stebalien Stebalien enabled auto-merge July 29, 2021 01:46
@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

@Kubuxu please followup with a patch to test this.

@Stebalien Stebalien disabled auto-merge July 29, 2021 20:26
@Kubuxu Kubuxu merged commit 98c99b4 into master Sep 28, 2021
@Kubuxu Kubuxu deleted the fix/vouchers branch September 28, 2021 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants