-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Large scale testing post FIP13/FIP8 #6156
Comments
For 1, @ZenGround0 has a spreadsheet for the estimation. Scaling:
Other conversation notes:
|
We should also evaluate the scaling cost of corn, as well as, state churn (amount of state that gets rewritten per epoch on average) as this determines size of full nodes and snapshots even more so than state size itself. |
Luckily, in the "good" case, cron only touches partitions if something goes wrong, and never touches sectors. But yeah, we need to consider the "everyone faults all at once" case. |
So, I think the whole dev-net part of this is a no-go, unfortunately, because we'd actually need to prove the 2k sectors. Instead, I'm going to go for a local simulation. |
I want to deploy 2K internal network in the test network to verify this function. What should I do? |
Figuring that out is part of the point of this project. However, actually running this instead of just simulating it may not be possible. Assuming a 10x growth (50EiB target), you'd need:
So my current plan is to simulate parts of it. |
2021-05-21 discussion: |
So, we're definitely going to need to do some devnet testing, ideally with fake proofs so we can make realistic seal batches. That won't let us "project" into the future, but will catch bugs like #6338. |
When FIP13 & FIP8 land, onboarding throughput should increase. We need to verify that lotus can handle this.
Outputs:
Related items:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: