Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testing utilities for passive testing in network deployment #229

Closed
Tracked by #249 ...
Kubuxu opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed
Tracked by #249 ...

Testing utilities for passive testing in network deployment #229

Kubuxu opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
testing Related to testing and validation

Comments

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Contributor

Kubuxu commented May 15, 2024

  • configuration format suitable to execute test scenarios
  • configuration propagation
    • Manifest version in the gpbft messge
    • Manifest fetching
    • applying the manifest
  • re-bootstrapping
  • power table editing
@jennijuju jennijuju added this to F3 May 15, 2024
@jennijuju jennijuju moved this to Ready in F3 May 15, 2024
@jennijuju jennijuju added the testing Related to testing and validation label May 15, 2024
@masih
Copy link
Member

masih commented May 16, 2024

I think we can move all of this as sub tasks under #227

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kubuxu commented May 16, 2024

The intended difference between these two is timing. This needs to land before the Lotus release.

@masih
Copy link
Member

masih commented Aug 7, 2024

@Kubuxu I think we can mark this as done?

@masih masih moved this from In progress to Done in F3 Aug 7, 2024
@masih masih closed this as completed by moving to Done in F3 Aug 7, 2024
@masih
Copy link
Member

masih commented Aug 7, 2024

Marking as done. Please feel free to reopen if there is anything that I might have missed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing Related to testing and validation
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants