You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
I think there is a bug in reliable sender's connection's pending replies queue ordering, but please let me know if it is my understanding that is lacking.
If we send multiple messages to a peer, there is no reason that the acknowledgements will be received in the same order. Yet the code seems to assume that because it is sending the received ACK message to the first handler in the queue (pop_front).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello.
I think there is a bug in reliable sender's connection's pending replies queue ordering, but please let me know if it is my understanding that is lacking.
If we send multiple messages to a peer, there is no reason that the acknowledgements will be received in the same order. Yet the code seems to assume that because it is sending the received ACK message to the first handler in the queue (pop_front).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: