You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
I have managed to replicate the results on the paper for English and German FastText. For reference, I am interested in the cross-lingual word similarity task. Results I got are (reporting spearman correlation):
Original FastText: 9%
Mapped FastText: 71%
However, I tried the same code on English and German GloVe embeddings and did not get much improvement. Results:
Original GloVe: 1%
Mapped GloVe: 3%
Any idea why this might be the case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I have managed to replicate the results on the paper for English and German FastText. For reference, I am interested in the cross-lingual word similarity task. Results I got are (reporting spearman correlation):
Original FastText: 9%
Mapped FastText: 71%
However, I tried the same code on English and German GloVe embeddings and did not get much improvement. Results:
Original GloVe: 1%
Mapped GloVe: 3%
Any idea why this might be the case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: