You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several users would like to see improvements that make it easier and more flexible to get hold of specific biogeochemical variables for use within the physics model.
In tandem, documentation on this topic could be improved/expanded: it is not very clear how to get/couple dependency from a physical model – especially if the dependency is not on FABM’s list of standard variables.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Based on user feedback:
Several users would like to see improvements that make it easier and more flexible to get hold of specific biogeochemical variables for use within the physics model.
In tandem, documentation on this topic could be improved/expanded: it is not very clear how to get/couple dependency from a physical model – especially if the dependency is not on FABM’s list of standard variables.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: