Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Order of exercises? #4

Closed
catb0t opened this issue Jun 2, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Order of exercises? #4

catb0t opened this issue Jun 2, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@catb0t
Copy link
Contributor

catb0t commented Jun 2, 2016

I've been reading the piles of documentation littered throughout the Exercism project, and I'm fairly clear on how to implement problems. What I find very confusing or vague at best is, how to know which exercise I should put after this one?

Obviously, the hello-world exercise is easiest -- string concatenation / formatting, so it's first. Leap year (which is the second exercise in Python, JS, Racket and probably lots of others) is a little bit harder, but not very hard, so it goes at spot 2.

I haven't read all or even most of the problems in the x-common repo, but I kinda assume they get harder as the track progresses... yes? If this is the case, should I order problems in the same way as another track that has many problems implemented? Or does it not matter?

@kytrinyx
Copy link
Member

kytrinyx commented Jun 3, 2016

I've been reading the piles of documentation littered throughout the Exercism project

Ow, yeah I'm so sorry about that! I really need to figure out how to put the right documentation in the right place.

I haven't read all or even most of the problems in the x-common repo, but I kinda assume they get harder as the track progresses... yes?

Yeah, that's the idea, but it's kind of a rough guess when we start a new track, because different languages have different concepts that get introduced in the various problems.

Take a look at how the Rust track is tackling this: exercism/rust#127

@catb0t
Copy link
Contributor Author

catb0t commented Jun 3, 2016

Sweet, that's really helpful!

@catb0t catb0t closed this as completed Jun 3, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants