You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the expected way to perform function prediction?
I read the FunctionTokenizer class and noticed that if we provide even one FunctionAnnotation, all other residues without a specified function are labeled with the <none> token. I also observed that the <mask> token is equal to the <pad> token, and when there are no function annotations, all residues are tokenized as <pad>, which is also treated as <mask>.
What does this mean? Are we supposed to make function predictions without providing known keyword annotations?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
What is the expected way to perform function prediction?
I read the
FunctionTokenizer
class and noticed that if we provide even oneFunctionAnnotation
, all other residues without a specified function are labeled with the<none>
token. I also observed that the<mask>
token is equal to the<pad>
token, and when there are no function annotations, all residues are tokenized as<pad>
, which is also treated as<mask>
.What does this mean? Are we supposed to make function predictions without providing known keyword annotations?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions