Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade integration tests to run against geth 1.9 #1521

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 23, 2020

Conversation

kclowes
Copy link
Collaborator

@kclowes kclowes commented Nov 21, 2019

What was wrong?

Integration tests didn't cover the new-ish Geth 1.9 releases.

How was it fixed?

Added a fixture for Geth 1.9 and updated tests accordingly.

Todo:

Cute Animal Picture

image

@kclowes kclowes changed the title [WIP] Upgrade integrations tests to run against geth 1.9 [WIP] Upgrade integration tests to run against geth 1.9 Nov 22, 2019
@kclowes kclowes force-pushed the upgrade-geth-190 branch 3 times, most recently from d1ae142 to 1e7156a Compare December 5, 2019 19:45
@kclowes kclowes force-pushed the upgrade-geth-190 branch 5 times, most recently from b9a3701 to c431552 Compare January 15, 2020 18:24
@kclowes kclowes changed the title [WIP] Upgrade integration tests to run against geth 1.9 Upgrade integration tests to run against geth 1.9 Jan 15, 2020
@kclowes kclowes requested a review from pipermerriam January 15, 2020 18:58
tests/integration/go_ethereum/common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/integration/go_ethereum/conftest.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/integration/go_ethereum/test_goethereum_http.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
'--nodiscover',
'--fakepow',
yield from base_geth_command_arguments
yield from (
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pipermerriam is there a better way to clean this up instead of using 2 yield froms in a row?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, but the two yield from statemeents are what I would do.

@kclowes kclowes merged commit cdf35dd into ethereum:master Jan 23, 2020
@kclowes kclowes deleted the upgrade-geth-190 branch April 29, 2020 20:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants