Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geth 1.9.9 not syncing #20496

Closed
ankita-p17 opened this issue Jan 3, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

geth 1.9.9 not syncing #20496

ankita-p17 opened this issue Jan 3, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@ankita-p17
Copy link

ankita-p17 commented Jan 3, 2020

Hi,

After I reported the issue #20435 and muir glacier upgrade I updated my geth to 1.9.9 and using the same dataset collected using 1.9.8

System information

Geth version: 1.9.9
OS & Version: Linux

Expected behaviour

It should start to sync

Actual behaviour

Jan 03 07:22:39 dcx-geth geth[11833]: INFO [01-03|07:22:39.040] Initializing fast sync bloom             items=11527142 errorrate=0.000 elapsed=48.007s
Jan 03 07:22:31 dcx-geth geth[11833]: INFO [01-03|07:22:31.040] Initializing fast sync bloom             items=9318579 errorrate=0.000 elapsed=40.006s
Jan 03 07:22:23 dcx-geth geth[11833]: INFO [01-03|07:22:23.039] Initializing fast sync bloom             items=7778639 errorrate=0.000 elapsed=32.006s
Jan 03 07:22:15 dcx-geth geth[11833]: INFO [01-03|07:22:15.034] Initializing fast sync bloom             items=7763381 errorrate=0.000 elapsed=24.000s
Jan 03 07:22:07 dcx-geth geth[11833]: INFO [01-03|07:22:07.033] Initializing fast sync bloom             items=4985442 errorrate=0.000 elapsed=16.000s
Jan 03 07:21:59 dcx-geth geth[11833]: INFO [01-03|07:21:59.033] Initializing fast sync bloom             items=1465133 errorrate=0.000 elapsed=8.000s

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

install geth 1.9.9 and start to sync

Please suggest. I need my geth to sync completely as soon as possible
@fjl @ligi @karalabe

@ankita-p17
Copy link
Author

Hello, any update on this?

@karalabe
Copy link
Member

We've been looking into it. One question however, does your node have UDP connectivity? From the logs it seems as if you're completely firewalled off

@ankita-p17
Copy link
Author

We've been looking into it. One question however, does your node have UDP connectivity? From the logs it seems as if you're completely firewalled off

No it doesn't have

@ankita-p17
Copy link
Author

We've been looking into it. One question however, does your node have UDP connectivity? From the logs it seems as if you're completely firewalled off
But before also it was working fine with these network configurations

@karalabe
Copy link
Member

We have a fallback in place so if discovery doesn't work for whatever reason, the node still tried to latch itself to the bootnodes. A refactor of the discovery (we're prepping for DNS discovery) broke this fallback mechanism in 1.9.9, so UDP was a must. We've fixed it (and released) in 1.9.10 just now. Please check again.

That said, this is really a very unhealthy fallback, since the bootnodes may or may not have enough slots open. You should really sort out UDP connectivity (at least make sure DNS will work as that will be shipped soon and may solve your problems too).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants