Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using an original model trained in espnet1 #66

Open
supernaiter opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Using an original model trained in espnet1 #66

supernaiter opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@supernaiter
Copy link

Thank you for always providing good tools and continuous support.
I have a good model trained on espnet1 and would like to use it in espnet model zoo, can I use the model trained on espnet1 in model zoo?
I am trying to reproduce the same results with espnet2 but so far have not been successful.

@sw005320
Copy link
Collaborator

Unfortunately, espnet1 cannot be used. It is based on a very different interface.
If you have issues reproducing the same results with espnet2, you can post it in the espnet issues. We'll try to help.

@supernaiter
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your reply. Is there any tool or way to convert espnet1 project or model to espnet2's?

@sw005320
Copy link
Collaborator

I'd say it isn't easy.
I recommend you check the espnet2 config similar to your current problem (regarding the amount of training data and language).

@supernaiter
Copy link
Author

I'm trying many different settings but haven't succeeded yet. I am using the same data for the experiments.

Should I compare these two files?
conf/train.yaml from espnet1
and
conf/train_asr_transformer.yaml from espnet2

@sw005320
Copy link
Collaborator

Which data are you using?
Which language?
How many hours?
Then, I'll let you know which config is appropriate.

As I said, it is better to make an issue in https://github.com/espnet/espnet

@supernaiter
Copy link
Author

supernaiter commented Aug 14, 2022

Ok, I'll make an issue in espnet/espnet#4571

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants