Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
By default, Wireshark calculates the SEQ per the packets it captures. Therefore, when not all packets are captured, SEQ will not be the actual number. See this StackExchange explanation, including how to view the real SEQ number. In this case, as there are 240ms between packets 14 and 19, probably Wireshark did not capture many of the packets during this period of time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
see below screenshot. Can someone help explain this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions