feat: Add globalIgnores helper function #159
Open
+158
−20
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Added a
globalIgnores()
functionWhat changes did you make? (Give an overview)
This pull request introduces the
globalIgnores
function to theconfig-helpers
package, allowing users to specify patterns for files and directories that should be globally ignored by ESLint. The most important changes include the addition of this new function, updates to the documentation, and corresponding tests.globalIgnores
function inpackages/config-helpers/src/global-ignores.js
to create a global ignores config with specified patterns.globalIgnores
function inpackages/config-helpers/src/index.js
.packages/config-helpers/README.md
to include a section on theglobalIgnores
function, with an example usage.build:dedupe-types
inpackages/config-helpers/package.json
to deduplicate types.globalIgnores
function inpackages/config-helpers/tests/global-ignores.test.js
.globalIgnores
inpackages/config-helpers/tests/index.test.js
andpackages/config-helpers/tests/types/types.test.ts
. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]Related Issues
Refs eslint/eslint#19403
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
I added a second argument to allow specifying a name. Is that the right approach?