-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add StorageIndex
newtype
#2332
Comments
I can take this up if its still open |
May I pick this up? |
Could I be assigned to this? |
It's already being implemented, in #2428 . |
Can I take care of this issue? |
Hi, I'm new to Only Dust and actively looking to start contributing to this community. If you think this is a good issue for a newbie in web3, I'll gladly help. |
Can I take care of this issue? |
Already in the process of review #2428 |
Can I contribute to this one? |
1 similar comment
Can I contribute to this one? |
Can I attempt this issue? |
In our database, every trie node has a unique storage index. We simply represent this as a
u64
in the code. The code would be a bit clearer and a bit less error prone if we had a simple newtype for it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: