You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be useful to allow for fitting the susceptible population (currently passed as pop). This would require enabling a mode where the susceptibility correction was applied to observed data as well as just to beyond the forecast horizon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes agree. A complexity is returning the resulting Rt (as can currently only return one thing from a function) and if its worth communicating both adjusted and unadjusted Rt
note you can already achieve this in practice if you moved the pop adjustment into the estimation window and used a ascertainment model but that isn't very clear and is a bit of a hack.
It would be useful to allow for fitting the susceptible population (currently passed as pop). This would require enabling a mode where the susceptibility correction was applied to observed data as well as just to beyond the forecast horizon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: