Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

estimate_secondary prevalence model does not recover the synthetic parameters #349

Closed
Tracked by #423
seabbs opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #432
Closed
Tracked by #423

estimate_secondary prevalence model does not recover the synthetic parameters #349

seabbs opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #432
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@seabbs
Copy link
Contributor

seabbs commented Jan 24, 2023

Currentl the example for estimate_secondary() does not recover parameters when the prevalence model is used. This could indicate a bug or it could indicate a general identifiability issue.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
EpiNow2 v2.0.0
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

don't defer negative binomial to Poisson at low levels of overdispersion epiforecasts/EpiNow2
1 participant
@seabbs